Beyond Labels

A 360° Discussion of Foreign, National and Local Policy Issues

November 7: Social Media and Elections

One day before the midterm elections, we’ll discuss the impact of social media on political (and other) discussion in the U.S. Potential sub-topics include:

  • Will Elon Musk lose his shirt in his Twitter acquisition?
    • What do we make of his moves at Twitter to date?
      • “Devastating” reduction in staff (according to a NYT news article)
      • Institution of a $7.99 fee for the blue “verified user” check mark
    • Given the $40+ billion purchase price, what would we do if we were in his shoes?
  • More broadly, how should user contributions (speech) on social media be regulated (if at all)?
    • How would that work?
    • Who decides what is true and what is false in a whirlwind of opinions, which are now commonly phrased as statements of fact?
    • Should Section 230 be changed? Interestingly (at least to me), a quick Google search identified more supporters of the existing law than opponents. EFF, Brookings, Cato, Seattle Times.

And we’ll undoubtedly find time to discuss Tuesday’s elections.

Recommended Reading

At today’s session, one of the participants mentioned The Paranoid Style in American Politics as an essay that he though resonated (at least with him) in today’s environment as much as it might have in 1964, when it was first published (in Harper’s Magazine).

At any rate, here’s a link to a PDF copy of the essay.

10/31/22: Two Topics

On Monday, October 31, we’re going to tackle two topics (assuming there’s time and continued interest):

Did Jack Welch “break” capitalism (or General Electric)?

Once revered by some as a “guru” amongst corporate CEOs, Welch’s legacy leaves something to be desired. Since his retirement, General Electric has fallen on relatively hard times. Are these problems the result of his management style? Were they caused by GE’s inability to find any replacement as effective as he was? Or just bad luck for GE?

Here are two articles from someone who seems to blame Welch:

What should we make of the decline in “the nation’s report card?”

The National Assessment of Educational Progress was released last Monday, and showed declines in student proficiency in both disciplines tested (math and reading) and student ages (fourth and eighth grades). But a close look at the results suggests that some of the partisan (both sides) explanations aren’t really supported by the data. So what’s going on?

There have been a lot of articles over the past week on this subject. Here are two (and article and an Editorial Board opinion) from the Washington Post to get us started:

See (some of) you tomorrow.

  • Subscribe via Email

    Receive email notification of new posts/announcements about our weekly meeting.

    Join 241 other subscribers
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments