Here is an interesting link to some data saying it is not a crisis – FWIW
http://m.nationalreview.com/article/376193/five-questions-mr-tom-steyer-benjamin-zycher
Here is an interesting link to some data saying it is not a crisis – FWIW
http://m.nationalreview.com/article/376193/five-questions-mr-tom-steyer-benjamin-zycher
At last week’s meeting, there seemed to be general agreement that the U.S. shouldn’t get actively involved…almost no matter what happened. The thought, I think, was that we should voice our support for democracy and democratic institutions and for the right of the people to select their government. But talk…and support in the UN, etc….was all that was on offer.
Now the situation appears to be getting more complicated (as it often does):
This also harkens back to another issue we discussed a few weeks ago…people’s right to self-determination. Does it apply to the people of Ukraine? What about the Russian speakers in Ukraine? Crimea? Where should the line be drawn defining which groups get to “self-determine” and which do not?
Will these developments (and new information for those of us who don’t track Ukraine carefully) change the group’s views on more aggressive intervention?
The suggestion was made at last week’s meeting that we discuss the President’s State of the Union address next Monday (February 3). Hopefully many of you were able to see it live (or delayed).
If you want to study it more closely (and I encourage you to do so, for a better discussion on Monday), here’s a link to the transcript of the speech as drafted. (I noted a few very minor departures in the speech as given–mostly exclamations, repetitions and an extra word here or there—that don’t change the substance of what was (or wasn’t) said.)
State of the Union Address (whitehouse.gov)