Beyond Labels

A 360° Discussion of Foreign, National and Local Policy Issues

Foreign Policy

Description

September 15 Topic: The South China Sea

In last week’s discussion of Isolationism (as it relates to US policy), we spent some time comparing the geographic “land grab” of portions of Ukraine by Russia as distinct from the ideologically centered ISIS activities (even though they’re also grabbing some land). In that context, the question arose about whether the geopolitical, Cold War “chessboard” was becoming less of a factor / threat in our foreign relations.

As a possible counterpoint to this theory, we’ll re-visit the recent developments in Southeast Asia next week, in particular, China’s activities in the South China Sea.

Dick Jacoby has offered the following notes:

For the topic “South China Sea” an excellent reference is “Asia’s Cauldron” by Robert Kaplan. Unfortunately, it is not available at the library.  Google “South China Sea Disputes” in Wikipedia and others.

See you on Monday!

 

September 8 Topic: Isolationism

I repeated Richard Jacoby’s post describing this week’s topic.  Art

Richard Jacoby
SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 AT 4:35 PM
Isolationism – Beyond labels topic for Monday September 8, 2014.
At the end of the last meeting with Art Newkirk and others I believe we settled on the topic of “Isolationism” for the next topic.
The word “Isolationist” is perhaps a political sentiment more than a strategy and swings widely with political attitudes and current events. Prior to WWII the American sentiment was 80 – 90% against any European involvement, even aid to England, which reversed to more than 90% in favor after Pearl Harbor. Since then, although the U.S. has taken a very activist position in the world, the isolationist sentiment has oscillated with events, most recently to pro intervention after 9-11 and more isolation with the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and Iraq – at least until current disconcerting developments in the Middle East and other areas.
The question is what should be the role of the U.S. in shaping world events and what are the appropriate means? When is “Isolationism” a viable foreign policy strategy?
I am short on references but here is an editorial from that cold war Machiavellian, Henry Kissinger:

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/henry-kissinger-on-the-assembly-of-a-new-world-order-1409328075?mobile=y

July 28: Oil and Gas “Fracking”

As the US tries to become more energy independent by extracting previously uneconomic reserves, hydraulic fracturing (“Fracking”) has become an increasingly common technique.

However, as the Wikipedia link (and other articles linked to it) above indicates, there is substantial controversy about the environmental impacts of the practice.

Next week, we’ll discuss “fracking” in the context of the US situation, the environment, its effect on foreign affairs (potentially decreasing the relative economic power of countries with low-cost energy resources).

  • Will oil and gas fracking be a stabilizing influence on geopolitics (Europe/Russia, China/India, Middle East, Venezuela, underdeveloped countries) or merely shift the distribution between the haves and have-nots.
  • What are the implications for Maine energy policy and how should it respond.

The May/June issue of Foreign Affairs has three good articles on fracking and is on the shelf along with an extra copy of the articles at BHPL.

The articles may be accessed free on the net by merely registering on the web site.

  • Subscribe via Email

    Receive email notification of new posts/announcements about our weekly meeting.

    Join 238 other subscribers
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments